Project Cover

Analyzing Session Recordings to Drive a 70.8% Improvement in Location Search Efficiency

TEAM

  • John Pakpahan (PM)
  • Tubagus Ghiffari Maulana

ROLE

  • UI/UX Designer, Researcher, and Strategy

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Users were completing the Refinancing Leads Form smoothly, until one field slowed everything down: Lokasi Pengajuan (Search Location).

By reviewing session recordings in Smartlook, I uncovered repeated hesitation during location search. A focused redesign led to a 70.8% improvement in search efficiency.

BACKGROUND

Why did finding a location feel so hard when users want to submit lead?

While reviewing recordings in , the pattern was subtle.

Users moved smoothly throught the refinancing leads form, typed their name, filled in their phone number… then they reached Lokasi Pengajuan/Search Location. And that’s where the rhythm broke.

the video is sped up by 3x

Some kept scrolling through a long list. Others typed their city and got flooded with options. Same district names, different cities. You could almost feel the hesitation.

WHAT I OBSERVED

Most users interacted with the location field in one of two ways:

Opened the dropdown and scrolled through a long list at the first moment they see it
Typed their city, district, or subdistrict name and faced dozens of similar results

Some district or subdistrict names appeared in multiple cities, forcing users to double-check before selecting.

The task required more attention than it should.

THE ROOT CAUSE

The dropdown combined three administrative levels into one searchable list: City, District, Subdistrict.

Dropdown item showing each administrative level

Users could type anything, but the system didn’t guide them through the hierarchy.

Search results were broad, repetitive, and ‘noisy’. The lack of structure made simple choices feel uncertain.

HYPOTHESIS

What if the problem isn’t the list, but how it’s structured?

If users narrow their location step by step, starting from province down to subdistrict, the search space shrinks at each stage.

Search location structure analogy

By limiting options progressively instead of exposing everything at once, selection should become faster and more confident.

SOLUTION

Progressive stepper selection

I replaced the single dropdown with a progressive stepper:

Province → City → District → Subdistrict

Progressive stepper mock up

But, Tebe, isn’t this adding more steps?

Yes, my manager also asked the same thing.

The stepper increases the number of interactions. But, here are the reasons why it doesn’t matter:

The previous design asked users to search across three location levels at once. That reduced steps, but increased uncertainty.

The new approach adds structure, not friction. Each step narrows the scope, so users make smaller, clearer decisions instead of scanning a crowded list.

RESULT

Location search time decreased significantly after introducing the progressive stepper.

the video is sped up by 3x

Average time

70.8%
(1m 46s → 31s)

Median time

63%
(1m 2s → 23s)

These metrics show improvement across both typical and extreme cases.

Users spent less time scrolling, repeated attempts dropped, and selections became quicker.

A structural change in one field restored the rhythm of the entire form.